Further results of the flow cytometry working group: Genom size of Phragmites australis in Germany
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21248/kochia.v18.220Abstract
Flow cytometric measurements on Phragmites australis from Germany always showed tetraploidy (n = 48). Earlier chromosome counts and flow cytometric measurements from Germany were thus confirmed.
References
Cavanilles, A. J. 1799: [ohne Titel]. – Ann. Hist. Nat. 1(2): 89–107.
Clevering, O. A. & Lissner, J. 1999: Taxonomy, chromosome numbers, clonal diversity and population dynamics of Phragmites australis. – Aquat. Bot. 64: 185–208. – https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00059-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(99)00059-5
Connor, H. E., Dawson, M. I., Keating, R. D. & Gill, L. S. 1998: Chromosome numbers of Phragmites australis (Arundineae: Gramineae) in New Zealand. – New Zealand J. Bot. 36: 465–469. – https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1998.9512584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1998.9512584
Gorenflot, R. 1976: Le complexe polyploïde du Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud. (= P. communis Trin.). – Bull. Soc. Bot. France 123: 261–271. – https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1976.10835694 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00378941.1976.10835694
Gregor, T., Dressler, S., Klemm, S., Ritz, C. M., Schmidt, M., Wesche, K., Wesenberg, J., Zizka, G. & Paule, J. 2023: The Data Portal “Chromosome Numbers of the Flora of Germany”: Progress After Five Years, Recent Developments, and Future Strategies. – p. 201–209. – In: Garcia, S. & Nualart, N. (ed.), Plant Genomics and Cytogenetic Databases. – New York: Springer (Humana). – https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3389-2_15 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-3389-2_15
Kuprina, K., Seeber, E., Schnittler, M., Landeau, R., Lambertini, C. & Bog, M. 2022: Genetic diversity of common reed in the southern Baltic Sea region – Is there an influence of disturbance? – Aquatic Bot. 177: 103471. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103471
Linné, C. 1753: Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas ad genera relatas 1 & 2. – Holmiae: Lars Salvius. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.669
Meyerson, L. A., Cronin, J. T., Bhattarai, G. P., Brix, H., Lambertini, C., Lučanová, M., Rinehart, S., Suda, J. & Pyšek, P. 2016: Do ploidy level and nuclear genome size and latitude of origin modify the expression of Phragmites australis traits and interactions with herbivores? – Biol. Invas. 18: 2531–2549. – https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1200-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1200-8
Šmarda, P., Knapek, O., Březinova, A., Horova, L., Grulich, V., Danihelka, J., Vesely, P., Šmerda, J., Rotreklova, O. & Bureš, P. 2019: Genome sizes and genomic guanine+cytosine (GC) contents of the Czech vascular flora with new estimates for 1700 species. – Preslia 91: 117–142. – https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2019.117 DOI: https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2019.117
Tikhomirov, V. N. 2021: A synopsis of Phragmites (Poaceae) for Belarus. – Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 52: 8–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31111/novitates/2021.52.8
Tischler, G. 1918: Untersuchungen über den Riesenwuchs von Phragmites communis var. pseudodonax. – Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 36: 549–558, tab. XVII. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1918.tb07308.x
Tischler, G. 1929: Revisionen früherer Chromosomenzählungen und anschließende Untersuchungen. – Planta 8: 685–697. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01916892
Verlaque, R., Hardion, L., Lambertini, C., Canavan, K., Verlaque, M. & Vila, B. 2023: New highlights on Old World giant Phragmites (Poaceae) using leaf and floral bract microscopic characters. – Aquat. Bot. 184: 103591. – https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2022.103591. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquabot.2022.103591
Zonneveld, B. J. M. 2019: The DNA weights per nucleus (genome size) of more than 2350 species of the Flora of The Netherlands, of which 1370 are new to science, including the pattern of their DNA peaks. – Forum Geobot. 8: 24–78, elektronischer Anhang. – https://doi.org/10.3264/FG.2019.1022
